Skip to content

Advisor

Phnom Penh's Arts & Entertainment Weekly

  • Features
  • Music
  • Art
  • Books
  • Food
  • Zeitgeist
  • Guilty Pleasures

Recent Posts

  • Guilty Pleasures
  • Jersey sure
  • Drinkin’ in the rain
  • Branching from the roots
  • Nu metro

Byline: Phoenix Jay

Hip to the hop

Hip to the hop

Ink teardrops etched into the corner of one eye belie the tenderness when he glances up at his young charges, which today is seldom. The story of KK, real name Tuy Sobil, has already been told. Like so many of the Cambodian diaspora who escaped the Khmer Rouge only to fall foul of the system in countries of so-called refuge, his homecoming was forced. But it was here in 2005 that he turned fate on its head.

Fate wasn’t the only thing turned on its head. Here, in vast cavernous rooms with artful graffiti adorning the walls, kids of sex workers, drug addicts, the violent and parents otherwise unable to cope come to immerse themselves in the head-spinng, beat-boying culture that was the first wave of hip hop. Kids who – with the help of a few grown-ups – have just released a new album of all-original material, A Na Koot.

“I guess they wanted to learn bad because they kept coming back and with KK you only have to come back a couple of times because his heart is just going to melt, so he’s like ‘Alright, I’m gonna teach y’all.’” Shorrt is a fellow mentor here at Tiny Toones’ headquarters deep in a bustling alleyway in Chba Ampov on the far side of Monivong Bridge. “Word spread – the kids went and told everybody else that KK was giving free dance lessons – and it became a boys’ dance club. It ended up being 50, 60, 70 kids at his house. They danced so bad you should see the floor! It actually started cracking the floor. I told KK at the time ‘Man, if the landlord ever sees that… How are you gonna pay for it?!’”

Shhort served as a big brother of sorts, making sure no one was fighting because they came from different neighbourhoods. “That was the first unique thing that KK brought: unity among kids from different parts of Cambodia who would beef with each other if they saw each other on the street. But in his house they had to lose that Bong Thom aspect: you’re going to be friends and you’re all going to dance together or you’re not allowed in. That was the main thing I saw that I’d never seen happening in Cambodia before.”

Sitting alongside Shhort, whose arms bear almost as much ink as KK’s, are three of Tiny Toones’ rising rap stars who feature on the album, not one of them older than 15. “The major change is how I feel,” says one boy clad in a Manchester United football shirt. “I’m more happy than I was before I came to Tiny Toones.” “My favourite is the singing and dancing,” volunteers another. “It has opened my eyes to different aspects of art, especially coming from foreign places. I understand more now.” One boy giggles. “I never believed I could be a superstar.”

“I was born in 1980 so I grew up listening to the first rappers back in the day.” Shhort, who first met KK in 2005, is here as chaperone. “To me, rap was a movement. That’s why I fell in love with rap music. It was people living in the ghettoes speaking their minds. People were uniting through hip hop back in the day, with Queen Latifah and all those people. There wasn’t no gangster rap back then. Back then it was the b-boy, unity, love approach. With this album we’re trying to bring back that original love and unity aspect.”

Annihilating such beliefs is a central theme in the 15-track album, which touches on everything from domestic violence to lofty career aspirations. Over a year, with more than one late night, the kids worked to write, perform and record A Na Koot. The producer, barely a few years their senior, grins apologetically. “If I didn’t get the chance to produce music, I wouldn’t be able to sit still. My thing is to make beats. My mind keeps hearing them.”

Playful melodies dance above those beats, simple-yet-spacey electronica a gleeful nod to the glory days of hip hop – main rival in Cambodia to the ubiquitous K-Pop. Tracks are in the universal language of teenagers: I Love My Style; I Wanna Be A Superstar; Hope And Love. “The biggest change I’ve seen in the kids is their confidence and self-esteem,” says Shhort. “Within a couple of months they’re in the dance room, showing off. Kids I’ve seen being made fun of because of their weight or size, they become best friends with everybody. It works so well because the kids have ownership: it’s their skill, their talent. You’re giving people the option to express themselves. They have natural talent. We just give them the opportunity to show it. The parents are shocked at the potential their kids have.”

WHO: Tiny Toones
WHAT: A Na Koot album (price TBC)
WHERE: Autographed and delivered: email dave@nulltinytoones.org or call 017 394879
WHEN: Now!
WHY: Why in hip hop not?

 

Posted on April 25, 2013May 9, 2014Categories MusicLeave a comment on Hip to the hop
A very curious cabaret

A very curious cabaret

The figure emerges from a side door with a preternatural silence that borders on unsettling. Bare legs, hands and face are smeared with thick green matter; a few dark still-wet patches of unidentifiable sludge glisten under electric light. His hair has been coiffed into a fauxhawk that’s starting to wilt in the humidity; his camouflage jacket smeared with the same primordial ooze. From beneath it peeks a pair of blue underpants. And then there’s the humming – a low, monotonous warble. A few feet away, another figure spins slowly on the balls of his feet as he circles a small, green velvet ottoman.

Again.
And again.
And again.

No, this is not a scene from a lunatic asylum – although the Cambodian gentleman watching from outside, who laughs then lifts his arms and spins in mimicry of the dancer’s very purposeful pirouetting, could almost be forgiven for thinking so. The fact of the matter is far from it. For this, darlings, is ART.

But we’re not talking your run-of-the-mill, common or garden, ho-hum sort of art. This, ladies and gentlemen, is art for YOU: art that wants to muscle its way right past your intellectual defences and square onto your dinner plate. Quite literally. And it’s this splicing of performance art with food that’s at the core of a very curious one-night-only show by arts collective Common Sole at Java Café & Gallery.

Perched at a small dining table here in the downstairs gallery, a long-limbed dance and theatre artist from Kuala Lumpur cradles in his enormous hands a white ceramic bowl. His lips strain slowly, painfully towards it before his face snaps away in disgust. Repeat. Seconds become minutes. Minutes become… even more minutes.

“We were playing around with the idea of doing a variety show, some sort of cabaret concept, which is something I’ve wanted to do here for years now – to bring this idea of food and the experience of art together,” says Java founder Dana Langlois. “It’s basically what I’ve built Java on entirely and it’s something that I love: food and art.”

Here’s how this most uncommon of cabarets works: from the moment you walk through the door, you’re part of the action. Five performing artists from around the world present five acts, during which a five-course meal inspired by those acts is served. A Curious Cabaret has been crafted specifically to stimulate all five senses – ‘and perhaps a sixth’ – by fusing the classical elements of a dinner-cabaret and curiosities show with a very contemporary take on performance art.

“As we developed the concept, each person was clearly working on their own, which is really interesting because they [Common Sole] define themselves as a collaborative. The idea was that they would each retreat into this very personal space of their own, where they could develop their own idea, but that would then be presented as a larger show. It’s a very different approach than sticking five people into one piece.”

The number five is a much-repeated motif. During a rare break in the coincidentally five-hour rehearsal, Céline Bacqué, a contemporary dance graduate from the National Superior Conservatory of Paris, rests her shoulders against Java’s front porch and stretches under the damp night sky. “All of the ideas were developed around the number five. We have five fingers; we have five senses; there are five points on a star, five elements. For the audience to be able to feel the five senses at the same time: to look; to hear; to smell; to taste, to touch, but very organic.”

Each of the five courses, from Moroccan gingered chickpea soup to cinnamon-chili chocolate fondant and passionfruit syrup, use ‘taste, colour, texture and action’ to complement each of the solo performances in turn. The acts draw on influences as diverse as Khmer shadow puppetry and South Korean namsadang samul nori, folk music with its roots in ancient shamanism. Combined, they’re designed to ‘take the audience on a path through spirituality, memories, conflict, internal tension and the freedom of purity’.

“This is something that works very well in Java: always bringing the audience into the art,” says Dana. “I try to do this a lot with exhibitions and working with artists who are very connected to the audience. I truly believe the audience is part of the art; I’m not really a big believer in art for art’s sake, in that it exists in a bubble. Everybody’s different and I know there is a space for that pure artistic vision, but in my mind and my experience it doesn’t become art until it exists with an audience.

“A Curious Cabaret is something I’m very excited about because of where it takes the experience of art. It’s very connected to what I like to do with the gallery, being based in a cafe and putting art in public spaces. The cafe is the perfect catalyst for bringing art into people’s daily lives and even making eating an art. I strongly believe in the institutional spaces for art, but I think art should be for the public. I’m a big fan of making art part of our daily lives.”

A wild-haired American spectator tries to interject when someone in an oversized plum-coloured kimono starts jabbering at him in a foreign language. “Dude, seriously, I don’t speak French…” Then it dawns. The ‘art’ is upon him. Bruno Schell, comedian, playwright and stage director, has plucked from his elaborate hat a small origami swan and is pressing it gently into the American’s palm, all the while muttering softly and smiling. His piece, entitled Souvenir (‘Memory’), channels the spirit of his Cambodian grandmother and is paired with a dish Celine says “you have to open to discover; there’s an element of surprise to what you eat”.

In the finale, Black Butterfly, Céline and Un Rattana explore “nature in the night” via an exquisite pas de deux between shadow and light. Secreted behind a Cambodian shadow-puppetry screen, Rattana – the Moon – sweeps a light back and forth in an exotic dance with the silhouette of her counterpart on the other side, the balletic Black Butterfly. “Life’s cycle is mysterious, unknown… maybe because it is as ephemeral as it is infinite, empty,” says Céline. “The moves of the shadows, as the beauty of the night, make us feel a bit scared… as the black butterfly in harmony with the cosmos makes us feel free.”

Striding through the pregnant pauses between each of act is peripatetic poet-cum-philosopher Ann Kimlong. Musing on mysticism and metaphysics he meanders between tables, pausing dramatically now and then to look extra pensive.

But the sensory stimulation positively risks overload when Franco-Cambodian theatre performer/‘body percussionist’ Eric Ellul – he of the blue underpants – bares his almost all. His mud-smeared ritual ‘will explore the tensions between accidental body positions, words and sounds: how these bonds create emotional states and energy that trigger a personal transformation, defining new territories of expression and feelings’.

At one point, you might want to avert your eyes. Says Dana: “I realised by the end of it that half of the performers are in their underwear! It might get more people to come…”

WHO: Common Sole
WHAT: A Curious Cabaret (tickets are $25 and on sale at Java)
WHERE: Java Gallery, #56 Sihanouk Blvd.
WHEN: 7pm March 22
WHY: Half the performers are in their underwear!

 

Posted on March 21, 2013June 9, 2014Categories TheatreLeave a comment on A very curious cabaret
Future of fear

Future of fear

The year is 2040 and the global recession has flipped the world economy. Asia is enjoying the global power status it last had in the Middle Ages, and the 350-year rise of the West has been almost completely reversed. ‘White ghosts’ – gweillo in Cantonese slang – live hand to mouth, forced to do the menial jobs once reserved for cheap Asian labour, or starve.

Among them are a suburban ‘baby maker’ couple with PhDs in robotics, who make dolls for rich Asian kids while dreaming of creating the ultimate killing machine (“I hear of people who make it to Beijing – and their degrees aren’t worth anything. They end up fixing ovens and toasters.”). A ‘human spammer’ oozes through offices and bars, making cash every time she drops brand names into the conversation; a ‘digital janitor’ risks his health entering the virtual past to pixelate logos in adverts. To earn a single canteen of fresh water, homeless brothers scour the countryside for silk deposits left by giant mutant spiders.

These characters from an all-too-probable future star in new mockumentary, Ghosts With Shit Jobs. The film portrays a New World Order in which ‘the economic collapse of the West is complete and the East is in full ascendance’. The premise is far from unprecedented: in December, the National Intelligence Council in the US published the report Global Trends 2030. In it, NIC Chairman Christopher Kojm writes: “We are at a critical juncture in human history, which could lead to widely contrasting futures. The world of 2030 will be radically transformed from our world today.”

Comparing the scale of global chance to the French Revolution and the dawning of the industrial age in the late 18th century, the authors note that Britain took more than 150 years to double per capita income. India and China could do it in a tenth of the time, with 100 times more people. “By 2030, Asia will be well on its way to returning to being the world’s powerhouse, just as it was before 1500.”

The film, screening at The Flicks with a Q&A session with Torontonian co-director Jim Munroe, taps into latent fears about the rise of the Tiger Nation and won the Best Feature award at Sci-Fi London 2012. Its ghosts star in patronising Chinese documentary Window On The World, which harks back to the kind of anthology films of yore that make distinctly cringe-worthy viewing today (“They have such resilience and spirit. We could learn a lot from these people.”). As Carole Jahme writes in The Guardian, “With no budget and only in-kind support, Munroe decided that rather than struggling to create all the 2040 gadgetry necessary some of it would be mimed. This works well – it is as though gadgets have become so sophisticated many of them are invisible. Some light touches with graphics and momentary sound effects are enough; the viewer’s imagination does the rest.”

The Advisor met Munroe, who has been compared to Philip K Dick and is more often to be found writing graphic novels and comics, to talk the rise of the East, the fall of the West, and sharpening the cutting edge of science fiction.

What made you choose this premise?

You see it in the news: scary graphs, how the West is going and where China’s going, and this undercurrent of anxiety and fear cycles endlessly. There’s nothing really explicit, it’s all in the undertones of the reporting. I wanted to put it into a story context because that’s how we deal with a lot of stuff culturally. I was interested in checking that out in a post-apocalypse that wasn’t a zombie post-apocalypse.

You’ve said in previous interviews that it wasn’t the economic angle but the human angle you wanted to bring to the fore.

I’m not really a futurist in the sense that some science fiction will do endless amounts of research into economic forecasts. I’m not hugely interested in being right about my predictions. It’s a ‘What if’ scenario. I’m more interested in putting characters into power dynamics than I am in economic theories.

The film taps into the latent fear of a global shift in the balance of power. I was braced for something far more horrific. What made you stop short of outright terror?

[Laughs] I’m not a horror guy! I think another creator would totally go in that direction. I’m more interested in the politics of showing how in the future they would be more patronising to us than we were to them.

The hosts of the Chinese documentary made pretty painful viewing.

There are people who, having seen the trailer, have accused me of being all ‘Yellow Peril’ and ‘Asia-baiting’. The idea goes back to at least the 1920s: the idea that the Chinese are overrunning our country. But to me it’s much more about the reversal of fortune. People’s memories are short: when they’re on top they forget what it was like to be on the bottom, at least within a generation or two.

We had a screening in Seoul recently and one of the programmers said afterwards ‘What you’re saying is going to happen, it’s just a matter of when and how Korea will fare given their relation to China.’ They’re thinking ‘OK, China’s going to take over. Where are we going to fall? Are we going to be seen as American sympathisers and thus be kept away from the table?’ It’s not going to be like the Third World, but more like the Second World; like Britain was in the 1940s and ’50s, where the quality of life is pretty low. I thought that was pretty insightful and more realistic than my notion of it being a Third World. We probably won’t fall that far, but we will fall. It’s just a question of how far. I found out yesterday that we got accepted into the Beijing Film Festival, which is a big shocker.

Will the film be censored?

I have no idea, honestly. I won’t be able to check their subtitles, so they might entirely turn it into government propaganda…

Maybe it’ll be a triumph of will and they’ll all start cheering.

[Laughs] Even North Americans admit this is going to happen. This could actually turn the whole thing. In 30 years, I might find myself commemorated with a statue: ‘After he was lynched in Chinatown in Toronto during the famine of 2023…’

Wired magazine wrote of Ghosts With Shit Jobs: ‘Excellent sci-fi isn’t dead, it just moved to the internet.’

It was a $4,000 movie but we intended it to be a no-budget movie, so it was a total failure [Laughs]. We had made a movie before in 2007 for about $700 and it took us about six months but the production values were terrible – the audio and video were pretty crappy, which was really distracting. We wanted to make something where the production values weren’t distracting. Our goal was to do it again but with more polish. We did pre-production over about six to eight months, where we’d skill share with people who were interested in making movies and wanted to learn about editing or lighting or acting; we tried to build a community. We had a huge pool of actors to choose from, but post-production people were very hard to find for free. We looked for people at that sweet spot who had the skills but also had some spare time and were willing to get involved. Our special effects person’s day job is working on movies like Resident Evil and Scott Pilgrim – big-time studio stuff – but she was really fond of our script.

Is this the future of filmmaking?

I’m a graphic novelist; I only got involved in making movies when it could be done for free. I enjoy the collaborative process, but I don’t like the culture at all. I think it’s a terrible culture. It’s so calcified; there are such standard ways of doing things and there’s a very conservative element that’s only interested in keeping things the way they are. I find that all terribly boring. The fun thing for me is to try to prove people wrong when they say you can’t do anything on a budget less than $1 million. It is possible; I’m going to keep making movies like this and I think more and more people are going to as well. If I want to write something that’s totally out of my imagination, I can write a book, but if I want to write a film that can economically be done, this is how to do it.

One of the techniques that kept costs down was using mime rather than special effects, which gives the film a certain theatrical feel.

It was definitely a choice because at some point we could have added effects. We only have them when the characters are in-world – when there’s visual feedback from the overlays and you can see stuff, otherwise we figured they’d have better privacy settings than Minority Report. I mean, someone’s going to be looking over Tom Cruise’s shoulder when he’s on the subway, so it made sense that it would be fairly invisible. The doctor – I know him from high school and he’d been doing some concept acting – he’s an artist and there’s a certain spatial intelligence he has that artists often have in terms of being able to picture things and turn them around in their head and get them right. He really stood out. The only direction we gave the actors was ‘Imagine there’s a giant iPhone in front of you. How would you interact with it?’

Given that you weren’t politically or economically eulogising, what do you hope people will take away from this film?

There’s definitely a political point to the thing, but it’s not on a country basis. It’s analysing that well-meaning documentarian who ultimately is almost predatory, turning people’s misery into a kind of consumer product. That’s something I’ve always had a problem with in documentaries and it’s so easy to fall into that. ‘Aren’t these people sad?’

Speaking of which, another powerful motif repeated throughout the film is that of a hamster in a ball. I know how that hamster feels.

[Laughs] It’s about the notion that people can cope with adversity and tell stories to themselves as to why their job isn’t so shitty; how they rationalise things. You see documentaries on the garbage man who thinks he’s an archaeologist: ‘People throw this away, but it’s history!’ That, for me, is at once uplifting and pathetic. It’s such a complicated thing. I was interested in trying to capture that and getting people to think more critically when they watch documentaries. There’s also an undercurrent, with the baby maker who ends up in jail and eventually blows up the cameraman with a battlebot; that’s a cautionary thing. It’s about someone who has ambition and talent but is just boiling in their own juices. There are a lot of people today who are cut off from all sorts of opportunities because of bullshit bureaucracy and racist policies. You get enough of those people, you cut off enough of those people and there are going to be repercussions. It’s not just a bad idea economically.

How has the film been received by the Asian community so far?

Toronto has the second-largest Chinatown outside of San Francisco. There’s one scene at a Chinese restaurant; one of the owners called just before the shoot. I thought: ‘Oh, no!’ He said: “We’re a little bit worried about the name of your movie. Some of the owners were just wondering about the ghosts part.” They’re very superstitious about the dead. I said: ‘No, no, it’s Cantonese slang for white people.’ He just laughed. “OK, that’s fine.” In a Canadian context you’d get people much more upset about using slang for another race – that would be the red flag, not dead ancestors.

Final words: I did feel slightly cheated when we didn’t get to see any giant mutant spiders.
[Laughs] It couldn’t have been anything but terrible, that’s the problem!

WHO: Sci-fi film director Jim Munroe
WHAT: Ghosts With Shit Jobs screening plus director Q&A
WHERE: Flicks 1, #39B St. 95 & Flicks 2, #34 St. 130
WHEN: 7pm March 15 (Q&A) at Flicks 1; 6:30pm March 20 at Flicks 1 & 2
WHY: A much-needed collective reminder of what it feels like to be cannibalised

 

Posted on March 14, 2013June 9, 2014Categories FilmLeave a comment on Future of fear
Jewel of the isles

Jewel of the isles

A blunt grey snout swims slowly into view. Following it, at glacial pace, glides a massive flattened head. Shards of sunlight flicker across vast blue-grey flanks that stretch seemingly into infinity. Pale vertical stripes lead up this colossus of the deep to meet two dorsal fins. Then a funny thing happens: the human brain, not designed to process such things, triggers its most primal survival instincts. Pupils shrink to pinpricks. Heart jack-hammers against rib cage…

JAWS!

Because this is a SHARK. A very BIG shark. The sort of behemoth that once prompted cartographers to scrawl across sea charts the ominous words ‘Here be monsters.’ But unlike the razor-toothed, man-eating protagonist of Peter Benchley’s 1974 horror novel, this is a gentle giant.

Rhincodon typus, better known as the whale shark, is the world’s largest fish. Where the great white or carcharodon carcharias sports a bite force of more than 18,000 newtons (4,000lbf), Jaws’ bus-sized cousin is a filter feeder who dines exclusively on plankton. A few weeks ago, off the shores of Cambodia’s first luxury private island, one was caught on camera by the $2,000-a-night resort’s scuba diving instructor – the country’s first recorded sighting of a live specimen since a French photographer spotted one near Koh Prins four years ago.

In the past, whale sharks daring to skirt our coastline haven’t always fared quite so well. In 1973, one weighing 800kg was shot by a soldier in Koh Kapi. In 1998, a 1,000kg example entangled in a gill net was later eaten by locals. A taxidermist was the ultimate recipient of an 1,800kg monster accidentally snared by fishing nets near the Thai border in 2007. And in August of last year, hundreds of people crowded into Sihanoukville’s Leak 1 commune to see a carcass hauled in by fishermen between Koh Del Koh and Koh Tas.

The safe return to Cambodian waters of what British marine biologist Barnaby Olson calls such “charismatic mega fauna” bodes well for the coastline’s future. Although pelagic species of such staggering proportions are rare in these parts, the sighting of a whale shark – known in Khmer as chlarm yak – seems especially auspicious coming, as it does, just as the country’s first private marine conservation area is formally extended to 40 times its original size.

Darting between foreign guests and local dignitaries at the blessing ceremony in the island community of Prek Svay (where, happily for those of us on a more restricted budget, you can stay in a guesthouse on the jetty for $10 a night), a small girl diligently gathers up empty drinks cans. “There she goes! She’s a little entrepreneur, that one. Next thing you know, she’ll be building a luxury resort…” Dr Wayne McCallum, an affable New Zealander, is the pencil-moustachioed head of Song Saa resort’s conservation and community programme. His task today, here in the Koh Rong archipelago, is to help cut the ribbon as the reserve set up in 2006 officially swells from 5.5ha to 219ha. Dabbing his face free of chili-induced sweat, McCallum offers his young charge another empty can.

This is the very essence of what Song Saa’s philanthropic arm, Footprints, is trying to encapsulate: ‘Luxury that treads lightly,’ to borrow from the official pamphlet. A full no-take zone, Cambodia’s first and only, extends 200 metres out from the shore of each island. Song Saa’s underwater lab, another national first, allows the marine team to monitor everything from reef generation to the impacts of climate change. One hundred artificial reef structures have been built. Borrowing once more from Song Saa’s tantalising literature, ‘While guests can snorkel and swim to visit the reefs, or view one on dry land at our Discovery Centre, those who occupy an overwater villa can view the reef through the see-through floor portion of their accommodation. Better than television, fish can be seen moving in and out of the artificial reefs without the need to get your feet wet.’

There’s more. The Blue Carbon Project gives guests the option of offsetting their footprints, while more than half the land has been deliberately left undeveloped as a nature reserve. And more: island community projects funded directly by profits from the resort now include everything from organic farming and aquaculture to solid waste management and midwifery.

“The general consensus is that things have improved since Song Saa was built,” says Nick Chandler, director of sales and marketing. “The owners, Rory and Melita Hunter, first visited here eight or nine years ago and it was a completely different place. They fell in love with the region and have been really conscious about ensuring this isn’t a big obnoxious luxury resort that just gets dropped in next to this little village. That’s why you see from the design perspective that Song Saa doesn’t stand out from 20 miles away: it’s designed to look like the surrounding fishing villages and blend into the landscape, while still providing the kind of amenities someone expects for $2,000 a night.”

Barnaby nods. “The response has been a very good one, partly because this island had a very strong sense of community to begin with. We’ve made a real effort to do the work in an appropriate manner, addressing the right people at the right time, moving things nice and slowly but making sure each of our projects has the legs to look after itself. We don’t just come in and throw money at a problem and expect it to work. We engage the community; explain why we’re doing things, how we’re doing them and what the benefits will be. Really build up a good understanding of what we’re trying to do. Two local guys do all of our community work for us. Having locals talk to locals: it doesn’t matter where you are in the world, that’s the way to go.”

Part of the Song Saa team for two-and-a-half years, Barnaby is a witness to how the ecosystem is changing as a result of their efforts to protect the archipelago’s giant clams, turtles and sea horses against the use of bottom trawling, poisons and explosives in fishing. “Certainly around Song Saa you can visibly notice more fish and more big fish, which is the important one because bigger fish produce more juveniles and the juveniles than add to the ecosystem. It’s important to be seeing these big snapper and barracuda and we’re seeing them here a lot more.

“It’s a very diverse system. We get slower-growing corals here; they save up their energy and put it into structural strength and energy reserves. In places like the Great Barrier Reef in Australia you get faster-growing coral, but it’s more boom and bust: it grows very quickly then along comes the next storm and flattens it. The corals we have here are known as boulder corals because of their shape – they look like big lumps of rock. They’re a lot stronger and have more energy reserves, which allows them to get through periods when the water climate isn’t so great and they’re not getting as much sunlight as they need.

“If you can protect a coral reef from all the impacts you can, whether it’s overfishing, damaging fishing techniques or uncontrolled anchoring of boats, then when that big ugly global impact comes along, whether it’s rising sea temperatures or pollution from another source, you’ve given it the best fighting chance you can. It’s the same with a human: if you’re stressed and tired and rundown and not eating well, of course you’re going to get that cold and that cold is going to put you to the floor, but if you’re healthy in every other way, that cold comes along and you can fight it off and stay healthy.”

But such eulogising isn’t restricted to Song Saa staff. Guests, many of whom are impossibly famous (our hosts are too discrete to name names but note that Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie were turned down when they tried to book the entire resort for Christmas just three weeks in advance), are getting in on the act, too. “The people who come to Cambodia have done so as a conscious decision, so automatically they’re a little bit different,” says Wayne. “Obviously not everyone comes with the same philosophy, but you only need a few. Some of the people we get here – we can’t say who they are – they’re pretty amazing. Someone left a $2,000 tip a while ago, which we gave straight to Life Options: no board meetings; no funding proposals, none of that crap.”

Whale sharks, sea horses and turtles: yours for $2,000 a night (or $10 – up to you).

WHO: Adventurous travellers with sound ethics
WHAT: Cambodia’s newly extended first private marine reserve
WHERE: Song Saa and Prek Svay, the Koh Rong archipelago
WHEN: Now
WHY: To live off the sea, we must understand and respect it

 

Posted on March 7, 2013June 9, 2014Categories FeaturesLeave a comment on Jewel of the isles
The thinking man’s heavy metal

The thinking man’s heavy metal

When Steppenwolf immortalised the term ‘heavy metal’ in their berserk 1967 biker anthem Born To Be Wild, they were borrowing from a source that had very little to do with music. The words had been previously deployed by William S Burroughs, appearing in his 1962 novel The Soft Machine, then again in the sci-fi hackery of 1964’s Nova Express: “With their diseases and orgasm drugs and their sexless parasite life forms – Heavy Metal People of Uranus wrapped in cool blue mist of vaporised bank notes – And the Insect People of Minraud with metal music.”

Traditional military speak for ‘fortified guns’, the phrase was immediately Hoovered up by Creem and Rolling Stone rock critic Lester Bangs, who regurgitated it in 1968 to describe a show by Detroit’s MC5. The signature sound is one that rolls up from the bowels of the Earth like an erupting volcano, but the effect is more than just physical. Done properly, heavy metal can loosen your very mind from its moorings.

Black Sabbath, heavy metal’s original chapter, are masters. As John Doran writes on thequietus.com, “Perhaps one of Sabbath’s most under-appreciated songs is… Children Of The Grave: an impassioned plea for politicians, media and the powers that be to tell the truth, over a galloping riff and clattering percussion. They were and still are the prime contradictory truth about heavy metal. Tough guys who threw peace signs. Headbangers who smoked weed but cautioned against the depression it could cause. The bringers of a violent new noise who railed against the war in Vietnam. The producers of a sound that was at once primitavist and virtuoso. Literate and loutish. Frightening but fun. The harbingers of a sound that was brand new, while carrying on a tradition that was jet black and centuries old. Sometimes obviously daft, always limitlessly righteous.”

Among the poster boys for this daft-but-righteous duality are Tool, cited by re-emerging Phnom Penh metal peddlers Splitter as sculpting their sound. “The thinking person’s metal band” is how Patrick Donovan of The Age described Tool: “Cerebral and visceral, soft and heavy, melodic and abrasive, tender and brutal, familiar and strange, western and eastern, beautiful and ugly, taut yet sprawling and epic, they are a tangle of contradictions.”

Here at Thea Heng Music School on Nehru Boulevard, wedged between guitar cases in a windowless room with granite-coloured foam slathered over walls and ceiling, duality is again the order of the day. Above thunderous drums and battering thrash guitar riffs soar piercing vocals and weird, experimental guitar melodies. Splitter call them ‘Squeedleedees.’

After more than six months offstage, busy evolving from a clean-shaven indie rock quartet into a 3/5-bearded heavy metal quintet and writing an album’s worth of original material, Splitter’s new line-up debuts at Showbox this week (“Not so much a hiatus as a gestation period,” says vocalist Sean Barrett, who’s quick to point out that his name is an anagram of ‘A Better Satan’). The end game: recording their first album.

The members, all but one in their twenties, all sport slightly crumpled cargo shorts and faded t-shirts. Bass player Wayne is loudly wishing he’d worn something he didn’t fish out of the laundry basket. We’re on the roof of Thea Heng on a muggy Saturday afternoon, taking a rare smoke break between tracks. Among scattered empty beer cans, the conversation turns to Tool, the use of odd time signatures and the importance of musical experimentation.

“Squeedleedees should be a proper music term,” says Doug, the band’s experimental guitarist. Sean nods solemnly and then giggles: “Pentatonic squeedledees!” Classically trained Norwegian jazz drummer Henrik, grinning from beneath a hefty ginger beard, slaps his palms on his thighs in a complex rhythm: “Drum moves have names like that: paradiddle and parama flimflam…” All five shriek in unison: “SQUEEDLEEDEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!”

Pressed to define Splitter’s sound during a rare moment when he’s not pogoing up and down in a sweat, Sean shrugs. “I have a really hard time answering that; I’ve been trying to do it since I joined the band. The short answer I give is that it’s metal for stoners but that’s not sufficient. It’s progressive but driven, I guess. Progressive in that we’ll use weird time signatures, play outside the major key, have weird instrumental breaks. Stuff you’d expect from bands like Tool and The Mars Volta, but with a more gut-level punk rock kind of force about it. It walks the line between going out really far into experimental metal land and still having a bit of an edge, but that’s largely the drummer’s fault; he’s a very energetic chap. Doug has a background in sound engineering, so he’ll use a myriad peddles and his music theory abilities and paint really fun weaves over what Ryan does… I jump a lot.”

Thrash guitarist Ryan, from the neck up nothing but beard, teeth and baseball cap, leans back against the roof terrace railings and takes a slow drag on his hand-rolled smoke. “You’ve got barang bands doing covers and Khmer bands doing stuff that’s hard as fuck. It’s nothing but pop-rock or deathcore. We offer something in between: a sound that’s heavy, but you can still groove to it.”

Doug, a founding member, conjures forth the experimental sounds of both Tool and The Mars Volta, while the down tuning (although they choose C over D) is a nod to Pantera, “the first to combine the drop D power chord with actual music theory virtuosity,” says Sean. “The Deftones are another one because early on they went back and forth between rapping and screaming. A few albums into their career they were all being very melodic but in a way that felt heavy on a heart level, which is hard to explain.”

Splitter – so christened when North London-born bass player Wayne, yelling for an amplifier splitter once in Sharky Bar, dropped both Ts and inserted a glottal stop much to the crowd’s amusement – squeeze back into the tiny practice space. Power chords. Scratchy noise. Chiming melodies. Thunder-roll drumming. The tidal wave of sound keeps coming. Atop soar man-possessed vocals: now a screech, now a whisper.

Lyrics probe everything from the peculiarities of expat life to more personal demons, including psychotic breakdown. Lube tells the cautionary tale of a girl ‘who took too many drugs and had to go home’; Purple, the dangers of women who turn out to be men, and Bitches on the Balcony surely needs no further introduction in a town like this. “Game Over is a fun one; probably our favourite to play,” says Sean. “It’s a heavy riff and the lyrics are on the surface pretty standard punk stuff, but one or two steps deeper what it’s really about is people who try to get rid of local religions so they can put themselves in the place of the people’s god. I think Pol Pot’s a good example of that; Mao Tse Tung’s a good example of that, too. But on the surface it’s basically Another Rise Above, by Black Flag: ‘You have power, we don’t. We are good, you are bad. We will get you.’”

Delving significantly deeper is Sharks and Spiders. “This one’s really interesting because the first and second parts are musically and lyrically very different. It’s about having a psychotic breakdown, which is something people write about a lot but the second half is about the other side of that: whatever gets people through it. For some people it’s religion; for some people it’s a creative outlet, some maybe find a significant other. It’s something that takes you outside of yourself at the end of the psychotic breakdown and it’s about the process of going through it. You can find songs by Nine Inch Nails about breaking down, but no one ever writes about the process of coming back together after the fact.

“The line ‘Every spider squatting’ is a reference to Infinite Jest, a novel that takes place in Alcoholics Anonymous, where addiction is referred to as ‘a spider that lives in the brain’. It’s about different types of addictions and neuroses being broken down by whatever gets people out of it, whether that’s painting or going to church. I started writing a lot but writing’s pretty insular, so it doesn’t you out of yourself. I think it was more playing in punk bands. Instead of just writing something and having it collect dust in a notebook, I was working with other people, screaming and jumping, things like that. Not much has changed. Splitter was once very indie rock, a little slower, gloomy, a little stonerish. There’s a lot more energy now.”

Each song is delivered with heavy chord progressions that tread the ground between classical traditions and brutal primitivism at punishingly loud volume. Only it’s the sort of punishment you can’t help but want more of. “A lot of the bands we consider our influence aren’t really metal in an obvious chug-chug-chug, rurgh-rurgh-rurgh kind of way. It’s more heavy in the way it feels. The Deftones are a good example: when you listen it’s not Cookie Monster vocals v drums, it has a certain sincerity to it. Lester Bangs, in his essay about Elvis, talked about the music giving him ‘an erection of the heart’. That’s from a Thomas Pynchon novel: ‘His heart became erect then came.’ That’s the type of stuff we want to give our listeners.”

WHO: Splitter
WHAT: Original heavy prog-metal
WHERE: Showbox, St. 330 (cnr. St. 113)
WHEN: 8pm March 9
WHY: A sound that’s heavy, but you can still groove to it

 

Posted on February 28, 2013June 6, 2014Categories FeaturesLeave a comment on The thinking man’s heavy metal
The far side of fashion

The far side of fashion

Style has been scandalising for centuries, with certain fashion trends branded everything from indecent to unpatriotic – not least the bewigged, stripey stockinged Macaronis of the 18th century. A dress made from 3,000 cow and yak nipples courted controversy two years ago at London Fashion Week. In 2010, Alexander McQueen launched a line of ‘hooves’ teetering atop 10-inch heels, and a full 25 years before that Jean Paul Gaultier invented ‘man skirts’.

Today, a little closer to home, Claude Garrigues – founder of the label CGBCN – is planning his own sartorial assault, a 15-minute ‘shock and awe’ fashion show the likes of which have never been seen on Cambodian soil. A graduate of the illustrious Esmode fashion school in Paris, Garrigues is launching his first collection – a collection created entirely in the small apartment he shares with his girlfriend in the southernmost reaches of BKK.

Here, among towering shelves and bulging wardrobes overflowing with monochrome fabric, this heavily tattooed Frenchman, inked koi carp swimming lazily up his left arm, has fused two of history’s most disparate style disciplines: punk and haute couture. Draped carefully over silver hangers, post-apocalyptic fabrics have been aggressively sculpted into deconstructed takes on the classic Little Black Dress. The Advisor pinned the ever ebullient Garrigues down to talk secret fabric societies, asphalt and wearing pyjamas in public.

Why fashion design?

If I’m not creating, I’m not living. At school, honestly, I didn’t like sewing. My god, it was horrible! But now I’m doing it and I appreciate having learned about it because I’m free to do what I want. Now I live with a sewing machine.

And I’ve caught you doing the ironing! You’re every woman’s dream.

Exactly! I start from a sketch, although what it is when it’s finished is rarely what I first drew. Sometimes I’ll be doing something that takes me to something else. I don’t really have a method. I have to be honest: I don’t know how I do it. Suddenly, POOF! I can be watching TV or talking with you and suddenly something starts. I always try to start with a sketch, but it’s really bullshit because most of the things they never happen or they change, you know? From this [points to a sketch] to this [presents a small bag full of black fabric sraps]: voila! This is your future dress! I don’t know what it’s going to be, I just get a feeling.

Where do you find such unusual fabrics?   

I cannot tell you. It’s a secret! I’m lucky; I’ve been initiated by someone who gave me the secret after many, many months.

There’s a secret fabric society here?

All the international brands have factories here and when they’re finished with the fabric, they just give it away. Finally, I have access to quality fabrics which come from end-of-stock collections. Fabrics from the next winter collections, I have them now.

How long have you had a fetish for fashion?      

When I was a young kid, I went to the shops with my mother and grandmother and they tried to make me wear something but I always decided by myself. Always I would take the most fashionable thing. I remember one pair of huge flares that were dark jeans on one side and light jeans on the other. I was very proud to get them. I think that fashion isn’t something I decided to do; I always knew it was what I wanted to do. My mother always dressed really well. Maybe to see her always being in fashion, every day changing her clothes, maybe this helped, I don’t know. But I always liked that and finally now I’m living my dream, here, cutting patterns and looking for fabrics in the middle of nowhere. And it might be crazy to say this but I don’t do it for the money; it’s about more than money. Of course I want money and we need it to survive, but the motivation – my pleasure – is the creative process. If you only work for money, you can’t be truly creative. I made CGBCN t-shirts to make money and now, with this money, I can be truly creative.

There’s a big difference between those first t-shirts and your new Punk Couture collection. 

They’re really crazy. This is the first collection. Let me show you; no one has seen these yet… What I have tried to do is work outside the limits. I break everything.

Have you always been this destructive? 

Yes! I have to be honest, yes. I need to be on the edge. Everything I do is really extreme; always, everything.

Is that what attracted you to punk?  

What I like about punk – you know, I’m 47 – when I was studying in Paris in my twenties, I was wearing Doc Marten boots up to here [indicates knee], tight jeans and a leather jacket. That was the spirit. I was a real punk in the 1970s. Also the music: I was born with that. The Sex Pistols, and all the French groups. I’ve never really been a fanatic: I like extreme things, but the punk look was easy extreme. It was like art. Wow, WOW! Just before, it was the hippy style.

It was a big shift, from flower power to Johnny Rotten wearing pinned-together suits because he couldn’t afford a whole one – a look you’ve given the haute couture touch in your new line.

This is the spirit! All deconstructed. Visually, it was really interesting. I didn’t understand it immediately; I think I’m just starting to understand it now. When I chose the name Punk Couture, it was because what I like about punk is not having rules. This is what I like in my creativity. I know all the rules, but I like to break them. If I didn’t know the rules, how could I deconstruct a dress? Many people start with deconstruction, but can’t do it because they don’t know the rules. Start with a square: what would you do?

Pass. I can’t stress enough how awful I am at sewing. How long does a piece take to make it from the sketch pad to the runway? 

I think I’ve been working on this for maybe two months, but it spends most of its time on the hanger. Each time I think about it, I don’t want to do it! It’s different: sometimes everything flows; other times you need time to think about it. This is the most difficult thing to learn: to be patient, because we want to finish things immediately, but you can’t do everything in one day.

And every piece is unique?

This one is mass production… [holds up two identical t-shirts]

Two? Hell, everyone will be wearing them.

[Laughs] It’s the top seller! I did it because I had a lot of zips like this so I said OK, I can do two! I’m not H&M. If I’m going to design something for someone, I need to feel a connection with them. I’ve become really selective.

So who are your clients? 

I would like to know! Obviously, they’re not here in Cambodia: they are afraid; they’re not ready. Cambodia is like a book of fashion history. When I’m here, I see the fashion of the 1950s and ’60s. You can imagine how I feel, with what I’m doing and the fashion background I have. Here we have the traditional with just a touch of modernity, but they don’t know – and I think they realise this themselves – they don’t know how to match the two. The big problem with fashion here is that for 30 to 40 years there was no development, but the rest of the world carried on – and not far away: in Thailand, Vietnam… And the big problem with bad clothes here is that everyone has been sending them second-hand clothes and they’re still receiving second-hand, second-hand, second-hand. Phnom Penh is a bit different, but immediately when you go outside the city you see they are wearing the clothes you were wearing 10 or 15 years ago. It’s like a look book of all trends and the way they mix them. For me, to be on the street looking at people – wow! Fifty per cent of the time it’s wrong. How can you match this colour with that colour?! But at the same time they are punk also because they break the rules.

Wearing pyjamas in the daytime.

I don’t know whether that’s good or not. I can’t judge that, but what’s interesting is that they do things that no one else is doing. You don’t put yellow, fuschia and red together! But OK, if it’s what you want to do. I came here intending to develop abroad: Singapore, Hong Kong, Seoul. They’re the places to be and when I do this I’m thinking of there, not here. For starters, there’s no fashion movement here. Magazines like F and Sovrin are trying to do something but they’re taking a risk. From where they are to where I am is a big jump and I don’t have time to wait. I’m old! You can’t compete in a country where jeans are $15 and a shirt is $5. I sell my jeans in Seoul for $450. Here, we need a lot of time to develop people’s minds to understand creativity: what is the difference between my jeans and the $15 jeans; what a designer really is.

Tell us about the show. 

It’s going to be something very different than people are used to seeing here. More than a fashion show, it’s a presentation. I don’t like the term ‘fashion show’ because here everyone claims to be doing fashion shows, but they’re everything and nothing: a runway, lucky draws, singers. With my show, you are coming purely to see the clothes: that’s six months of work for 15 minutes. It’s going to be very raw and minimalist; very underground, this music with the sophistication of the clothes. This is the ‘Why’ of Punk Couture. It’s a tribute to what I like: the energy and aggressiveness of punk. In the beginning it was really ‘RAAAARRRRGGGGH!’ This is what I like: things that are strong. And the couture because, finally, it’s design; it’s sophisticated.

Where do you get your inspiration?

I am urban. I like the green and the trees, but after 20 minutes I need…. asphalt! This is my visual call. Sometimes I feel lost here, but… I just want to show people the other side of fashion with Punk Couture. With that, you’re touching something different; you’re in another world. You’re opening doors that not everyone can open. This is a really creative trip and sometimes it’s, well, WOW!

WHO: Claude Garrigues
WHAT: Punk Couture CGBCN fashion show
WHERE: De.Gran Japan, #19 Street 352
WHEN: 7pm February 26
WHY: Sartorial scandal in the making

 

Posted on February 21, 2013June 6, 2014Categories FeaturesLeave a comment on The far side of fashion
La vie en punk

La vie en punk

A carved-up photograph of Britain’s Queen Elizabeth II with a safety pin through her face has become one of the defining images of punk rock. Created in 1977 by artist Jamie Reid as the cover for the famously banned Sex Pistols’ single God Save the Queen, it cemented the otherwise abstract social ideas the Pistols had sung about a year earlier in Anarchy in the UK. But the roots of punk ideology stretch far beyond the advent of Johnny Rotten; beyond even the sweat-soaked stages of the most venerable punk hang-outs in 1974 New York: clubs like CBGB’s and Max’s Kansas City, where bands such as The Ramones were launching their musical counter-culture manifestos. The seeds of punk’s anarchic politics, far from being American or British, in fact sprouted from mid-20th century French philosophy – philosophy that continues to shape punk to this day. The theory is perhaps most eloquently laid out by Greil Marcus in Lipstick Traces: A Secret History of the 20th Century, in which the author examines punk in the context of everything from Dadaism to Guy Debord. In the prologue, he describes how Johnny Rotten’s first moments in Anarchy in the UK, “a rolling earthquake of a laugh, a buried shout, then hoary words somehow stripped of all claptrap and set down in the city streets…” – I AM AN ANTICHRIST – “remain as powerful as anything I know.” For as Andrew Hussey, head of French and Comparative Studies at the University of London Institute in Paris, once told the BBC: “Punk rock would have happened in the UK without France. But without the French, without their big ideas and their politics and fanaticism, punk rock in the UK would’ve been nothing more than growly old rockers with shorter hair. The real influence of French punk rock lies in the ideas, the style and the ruthless elegance. They never produced a Clash or a Sex Pistols, but what they did was introduce the real politics in punk.” Those politics were the product of Gallic intellectuals hell-bent on cultural subversion and determined to change the world using art and ideas. Led by rebel extraordinaire Debord, they sought disorder versus authority; youthful zeal versus a sclerotic status quo – the very inspiration for what would later be called punk. Debord was a French Marxist theorist, writer, filmmaker and founding member in 1957 of what became known as the Situationist International – a group of rebels whose defining moment came during the Paris riots of May 1968, when they lent philosophical muscle to the students and workers attacking the state. By the time a young Malcolm McLaren arrived at the scene, the streets of Paris were quiet again, but he found and was immediately seduced by Situationist posters bearing slogans such as ‘Be realistic, demand the impossible’ and others that would ultimately find their way into Sex Pistols’ lyrics: ‘Cheap holidays in other people’s misery’; ‘No future.’ Followers of this prankster-turned-philosopher, finally proclaimed a tresor national (‘national treasure’) by the French in 2009, even helped popularise the very technique used by Reid on God Save the Queen: detournement, the process of flipping images directly against themselves and subverting them so that they become ‘cultural weapons’. But the spark that ignited the first flame of punk, ultimately, was one of boredom. Just as the Situationists sought to create a new world order in which urban areas were divided into zones corresponding to specific emotions, a city where you could find yourself in an unexpected ‘situation’ on any street at any moment, so, decades later, punks yearned for radical social change. As Eric Debrais from punk band Metal Urbain, formed in Paris in 1975, remembers: “Everything was black and white: the TV was in black and white, the streets were in black and white. Everyday life was extremely boring; you felt people needed a push so they’d feel alive. The idea was to stir the pot and see what happened and of course people in England were doing the same.” All of this is not entirely lost on Didier Wampas, for the past 30 years lead singer with another French punk band, Les Wampas – one of only a handful to survive beyond the 1980s. Born in 1962 and currently en route to Phnom Penh’s Sharky Bar, he may have been too young to appreciate the philosophy behind the Parisian riots of 1968, but he’s no stranger to music as a vehicle for rebellion. Mention Debord and his Situationists and the affirmations come thick and fast in a French accent equally thick and fast. “Aaaaaaaaaaaaah, yeah yeah yeah,” he bellows over an impossibly awful phone connection from Thailand at the start of Les Wampas’ Asian tour. “Why not? But for me, the beginning of punk rock was in 1976 or 1977. The music is the most important thing for me – the first Ramones album. Punk is about doing what you want; you can make punk music even if you don’t really know how to play. In 1977, every week there was a new single or album. I was listening to all the punk bands: The Clash, The Ramones, the Sex Pistols, The Jam – everything. It was great to be 15 in 1977. I was very lucky.” Wampas is rare among his brethren, refusing for three decades – until May last year – to resign from his job as a public transport electrician despite having produced 11 albums and a top 20 hit. The reason, he says, is that if he were to depend on album sales, it would compromise his artistic independence – a message reinforced with a loathing of artists who exist on government grants. “If you say you’re a punk, to want to have money from the government is crazy. You say you’re anti-system, but you want to have money from the government to play punk rock? I don’t care about working; it’s no problem for me. I can do what I want. I don’t care about radio or TV; I was just working and making music and I don’t care about the rest.” He’s not entirely immune to the trappings of international musicianship, however. Of his first solo album, 2011’s Shut Me Up, he says: “No, no, no. You can’t shut me up. Nobody can. The record company asked me if I wanted to make a solo album and I said no, but then they said ‘Do you want to fly to Los Angeles?’ so I said OK. It was in winter and they said ‘Do you want to go to LA for ten days?’ No problem! I didn’t want to make a solo album; I just wanted to go to Los Angeles. I did all the singing in a one-metre-square cupboard in the producer’s kitchen because it was cheaper than in France. Fun!” Despite having a dig at one of his former bass players on the track Never Trust a Guy Who, Having Been a Punk, is Now Playing Electro’, Didier and his Wampas – who call their take on the genre ‘Ye Ye Punk’ – span a myriad sub-genres, from psychobilly to pop-punk ballads. Les Wampas’ first album, Tutti Frutti from 1984, calls forth the joyous cacophony of everyone from Demented Are Go to The Cramps. “Oh, yes! I love this album but I didn’t want to be in a psychobilly band. I love rock ‘n’ roll and want to play everything, not just one genre. We played with The Meteors, with King Kurt, with all these bands. It was very fun on stage. And we played with The Cramps in the 1990s, which was a mad experience. But in real life, they were just disappointing – no fun at all.” Didier’s latest project is one involving his other band, Bikini Machine, now in the process of recording a new album in London. But if the name sounds as though it was inspired by Dr Goldfoot and the Bikini Machine – a 1965 B roller in which mad scientist Vincent Price creates a gang of bikini-clad female robots with which to seduce and rob rich men – the significance is lost on Didier, who seems more interested in the fact the London studio’s equipment all dated from the 1950s. What is not lost on Didier is how his on-stage philosophy differs from that of the Sex Pistols. Where the Pistols were infamous for spitting at and punching fans, Didier is infamous for singing off-key and in a high-pitched squeak, amd he prefers to climb into his fans’ midst and plant as many kisses on cheeks as possible. But just how long can he keep it up, after a punishing 30 years as a punk frontman? “You just try to stop me! I remember when I was 15, I knew I wanted to play in a rock ‘n’ roll band and I don’t want to stop. If you don’t want to stop, you don’t stop. I eat peanut butter sandwiches, like Elvis! Yes, yes, yes. It’s the secret of rock ‘n’ roll…”

WHO: Les Wampas
WHAT: French ‘Ye Ye Punk’
WHERE: Sharky Bar, St. 130
WHEN: 9pm February 22
WHY: French philosophy inspired punk rock. No, really.

Posted on February 14, 2013June 6, 2014Categories FeaturesLeave a comment on La vie en punk
Not just for laughs

Not just for laughs

Why do we laugh? The answer, argues Sigmund Freud in his 1905 book The Joke and its Relation to the Unconscious, is that jokes – much like dreams – satisfy our unconscious desires. “Jokes have not received nearly as much philosophical consideration as they deserve in view of the part they play in our mental life,” writes the Austrian psychoanalyst four decades before a young Lenny Bruce earned $12 and a spaghetti dinner for his first stand-up gig in Brooklyn. Freud has a point.

Stand-up comedy is arguably the oldest, most universal, basic and deeply significant form of humorous expression. From the fools and jesters of the Middle Ages, through 19th century humorists such as Mark Twain and Artemus Ward and finally onto the Rodney Dangerfields of today, comics are shamans: visionaries who use the alchemy of laughter to present the world in a different light.

“Changing the world, one endorphin at a time” is how Irish stand-up Aidan Killian puts it. A banker turned comedian (“Nothing funny about that”), he’s returning to Phnom Penh to offer a crash-course in stand-up comedy for the humorously challenged, cripplingly shy and/or would-be Lenny Bruces. Killian will school his comedy students over three days in everything from dealing with stage fright to great storytelling, with all proceeds – $100 per head – going to Operation Smile. Graduates will then deliver their own set at Pontoon on February 18 (interested? Call 012 968512 to register).

The Advisor caught up with Aidan in Thailand to talk Oscar Wilde, orgasms and how by being just a little bit funnier you can make the world a better place.

I was hoping we could explore the idea of ‘stand-up comedy as social and cultural mediation’, to borrow from one of the academic papers I’m reading.

Jesus Christ! What does that mean?

Once upon a time, about five centuries ago, Erasmus said something along the lines of ‘The path of folly leads to wisdom.’ The idea is that stand-up comedy isn’t just about making people laugh; it serves a much deeper purpose. The role of the comic as contemporary anthropologist, speaking truths that would land most journalists in jail; in your own words: ‘Changing the world, one endorphin at a time.’

Ahhhhh, nice! I haven’t used that phrase in a while. Well, Oscar Wilde, another great Irishman, said: ‘If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they’ll kill you.’ And that’s really it, for me. I go to comedy gigs every night because that’s the life that I chose, and a lot of comedy really is just about getting that joke. That’s the truth. I’d love to say 90% of comedy is about sharing your soul and helping create consciousness among the masses so that we all live happily ever after and realise the oneness of humanity, but it’s not. Most comedy is about chasing the laugh, getting laughs, and you see a lot of that on TV. However, the comedy I love most, and I think many people love, is something that’s going to make you feel; something that’s going to make you think. Something that’s going to make you see something in a way you might never have seen before and makes you question the boundaries that you’ve created in your life. George Carlin, Lenny Bruce and Bill Hicks immediately come to mind.

George Carlin and Bill Hicks are my favourite comedians.

You obviously haven’t seen my set yet.

I have – and they’re still my favourite comedians. 

Well, fuck you! [laughs] But look at what these guys did: Bill did 16 years of comedy and talked about his dad and him having a relationship. Silly jokes, but he made people laugh. And when people laugh, they release their stress. They’re in a place of happiness. It’s kind of like having an orgasm in the sense that you’re not thinking. You’re in that place of freedom and emptiness and nothingness. If you have that, then you’re more susceptible to positiveness, if that makes sense. So even though those jokes were silly and had no essence, he was still making people happy. Then he took it to a whole new level and everything he did – every word he spoke – had a purpose. That’s a huge gift. And we expect all of our students who do the course to be at least at that level after two and a half days’ working with me.

Ho ho. So does laughter have a role in making us more susceptible to certain ideas? 

I see laughter as breaking down defences. I look for the truth that I most want to speak and then I say that, but if I just say that and it’s not funny, I look like a lecturer and most people are going to attack me because I’m not going along with mainstream thought. The laughter is necessary because if people laugh, they’re accepting what you’re saying – we’re laughing at the same things; we’re connecting. If they’re laughing, and the people around them are laughing, whatever you’re saying becomes the general consensus in that room: This Is Funny. Whether they agree with what I’m saying or not, they’ve accepted that what I’m saying is a funny experience. They’re laughing, and now I can pound them with some serious fucking truth: we are all Christ-like human beings; we are gods; we are kings and queens. I can say something like that – empower them – and then make them laugh. It’s like punching them with something good that they wouldn’t normally take because they’d be too busy going ‘No, no, no, I’m not a queen, I don’t deserve to be loved, I’m just an inputter in my job that I hate…’ But it gives people a chance to think, because you sandwich in what they need to hear between moments of laughter.

Humour helps you escape the censors.

Absolutely! I wonder if I could get away with the things that I say without being funny. I think they’d probably lock me up. I suppose that because people are laughing, you can just say whatever the fuck you want. It’s interesting because, as a comedian, you can kind of do whatever you want too. I can be out in public and I can say to someone speaking too much at a table, someone I think is taking up too much of the conversation and isn’t interesting enough, as a comedian I can say: ‘Hang on a second. You’re using up too many words. There are four people here and you should be taking up 25% but you’re taking up 80%. Can you please stop?’ I can say that and they’ll just go ‘Ah, he’s being funny.’

No, no, really. Just shut the fuck up.

[Laughs] That’s what it comes down to. It’s a label: that’s comedy, so it’s allowed. We like laughing. I can talk about Obama being captain of the child-killing drones, the face of the fourth Reich, because it’s just Aidan being funny. Only it isn’t. There are drones killing children and someone’s allowing that to happen. Blaming one person may be silly, but at the end of the day he’s Adolf Hitler… [Aidan’s doorbell rings in the background] Can I take this? I’m just going to open the door. I don’t know who it is. I don’t have any friends. Maybe it’s Obama. Shit! I shouldn’t have said that online… ARGGGH! [Pause] I got peanuts! I got peanuts! My security guard – mwah ha ha ha ha – brought me warm peanuts.

Nice. So, let’s take a closer look at how the folk who complete your course can deploy stand-up weaponry in their everyday lives. 

Let’s put this in perspective: these guys are going to be doing stand-up comedy for the first time in their lives, most of them. They’re not going to be great in comparison to where they would be if they did stand-up comedy for one year, five years, 50 years because it takes time. However, they will leave the stage to the sound of laughter and clapping and they’ll feel really good about themselves, like I did after my first gig. I felt like the king of the world. The idea is this: most people think ‘I’m not funny; I’m not interesting; I could never do that; I’m not good at public speaking; I’m too shy,’ but this is simply a belief; an idea in your head. Once you break that idea and go to the opposite extreme – stand up on stage and do live stand-up comedy, which is videotaped so that you can see yourself making people laugh – you can never say that again. It breaks down this limiting belief that we’ve created and also it leaves people thinking: ‘What other things did I used to think I couldn’t do that I actually can do?’ That’s why I did stand-up: because people said I couldn’t.

Take us back to your first time.   

Well, she was 16 and I was 25. She was screaming: ‘Get off me!’

Not THAT first time. The OTHER first time. 

Oh! Oh, silly me. Oh my God. No. My first time was in a hotel with my girlfriend, by the way. Isabelle was her name. It still is… OK, right. First time: I was at a stand-up comedy show for expats in Tokyo with my friend and mentor at Bear Stearns, Steve. I said to him: ‘I could do that.’ And he said: ‘Why don’t you go put your name down?’ I had a month to prepare a three-minute set. I was so nervous. I don’t remember ever being so scared. I’ve been in fights; I’ve had a guy swing a glass at me, I’ve been scared but never this sort of fear. Your whole stomach goes completely. I think I went to the toilet seven times, but you don’t need to print that. My body didn’t work and my head was all over the place. I didn’t feel balanced or normal; I felt like I was drugged with fear. But I did it and as soon as I got the first laugh it was amazing; just beautiful. The most natural high I’d ever had.

But how do you teach others to be funny?

Well, let’s break it down. What exactly is happening when you’re on stage in front of people? Let’s list all the things that are happening. So, there are people looking at you. What else is happening?

You’re looking at them. 

Correct! So, you’ve got eye contact. You’re speaking. You have to be funny. You’re trying to control the physical and psychological effects of fear. And you’re breathing; they’re connected. So, it’s a scary experience having to go up on stage and make people laugh. Most people would be scared of just having to get on stage and having people look at them, to a certain extent. Let’s break it down even more. Some people find it difficult just to hold eye contact with one person, not to mention a whole room. They get nervous and speak too fast, or they don’t speak at all. So we start off with the basics: get two people to hold eye contact for 30 seconds. What often happens is that people start to giggle. So why are they laughing? What is it that makes us laugh under such circumstances? It’s tension, and we release tension in two ways: one is through laughter; the other through sex. Either way, I win. Boom! [laughs] Once we understand that, we can use tension to be funny: we build tension and then release it. That’s one way of making people laugh. So first I want people to be confident enough just to stand on stage, then I want to get them to be funny. When they’re comfortable I want to hear about you. Who are you? What do you care about? What emotions do you feel? What makes you angry? What makes you sad? What scares you? I don’t want to hear ‘I was on a bus and something funny happened…’ I want something personal. Everything is funny. It’s quite amazing: there’s no subject you can pick, apart from rape and paedophilia, that isn’t funny. So what do you want to talk about? How do you want to make people laugh? What do you want to leave people with? Then I’m going to give you some comedy tools and you’re going to put them on top of whatever it is you want to talk about.

Give us an example of a comedy tool. 

OK. I’m going to say two things and then you’re going to say whatever comes into your head, very quickly. Ready? Apples, oranges…

Bananas. That wasn’t funny at all.

The first thing, apples, was the point of introduction. I said ‘apples’, so you got a clue. The second point is confirmation of the first. I said ‘oranges’, so you now know where we’re going and can pick a random fruit because two points implies a direction and you can work out the next point yourself. So, how do we make that funny? If we can create a direction, and then break that direction, we’re misleading the audience. We say the opposite, so: ‘Me and Annie went for a walk in the park and we saw some ducks and we started feeding them and then I stabbed her in the face.’

 

You see the simplicity of it? Point one: we’re in the park. Point two: ducks are in the park. Point three: something completely random. Then we add in the details of the story, because it’s genuinely funnier if the audience actually cares about the story. You’ve made them feel something.

Most people don’t do this course because they want to become stand-up comedians. They just want to be able to be funny; to be interesting; to tell stories, to have that bungee-jump experience of self-help where you can actually stand on stage in front of a live audience and share your own unique life with them and make them laugh. If you can do that, you can do anything.

WHO: Aspiring stand-up comedians (or anyone who wants to polish their presentation skills)
WHAT: Aidan Killian’s comedy crash course
WHERE: Pontoon, St. 172
WHEN: February 15 – 18
WHY: “If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they’ll kill you.” – Oscar Wilde

 

Posted on February 13, 2013June 6, 2014Categories MusicLeave a comment on Not just for laughs

Of grunge & meat grinding

On 8 April 1994, the day Kurt Cobain’s body was discovered in his Seattle home, local journalist Charles R Cross picked up the phone to hear CNN’s Larry King bellowing: “Tell me, what is ‘grunge music’?” It was – and still is – a bloody good question.

“Grunge isn’t a musical style. It’s complaining set to a drop D tuning,” DJ/journalist Jeff Gilbert once quipped to Mark Yarm, author of Everybody Loves Our Town: An Oral History of Grunge. The term, now wedded to the bleak sound of Seattle, appears as far back as on the sleeve of a 1957 Johnny Burnette rockabilly album. By April 1972, American rock critic Lester Bangs was using it in Rolling Stone magazine to describe the muddy, indistinct sound of a Count Five album. In 1988, Seattle music label Sub Pop used it to promote a Green River album: “Gritty vocals, roaring Marshall amps, ultra-loose GRUNGE that destroyed the morals of a generation.”

Today, years after Cobain decried the wholesale export of the Seattle scene as a prefabricated trend, grunge still retains meaning. Unlike the sound of its hipster successors in the early 2000s, this stripped-back primeval rock music eschewed artifice in favour of grinding bass riffs, thrashy guitar and pictures-falling-off-the-walls drums.

Such is the sound of The Mincers, Tasmanian peddlers of grunge-inspired girl rock, here to promote their debut album and record new material with Professor Kinski of local raga-dub band, Dub Addiction. We caught up with lead vocalist, guitarist and songwriter Zoe Visoiu to talk Nirvana, environmentalism and Facebook relationship statuses.

The Mincers take me back to thrashing around in student mosh pits in the ’90s.

I also spent a lot of time thrashing around in student mosh pits in the ’90s! But I grew up in Tasmania in the forest valley of Jackey’s Marsh. I was quite isolated as a child and after having enough of art school, I moved to Melbourne, where I became drawn into an amazing spoken word scene there.

It was a very eclectic scene and I began to feel that my poetry would be more powerful if it were set to music. So I started teaching myself guitar and to consider the song-writing elements and never looked back once I discovered the three-minute pop song, which is a really powerful medium.

We’re not spoken word specifically, but that was the place where I took off from stylistically and have become more concerned with vocalisation as time has gone by. I plan to incorporate some spoken monologue into the shows. I move between speaking and singing, the melody comes and goes depending on the content, subject and emotion involved in my lyrics. A lot of my lyrics are very personal and almost diaristic in nature.

 

How so?

Some of my songs are inspired by relationships and some are like a diary. Some of the songs I write when I actually have something in my life that I can’t quite quantify and I feel like by turning it into a song, I can transform it into something beautiful when it hasn’t been beautiful. It’s existential in a way: by acknowledging the experience, it’s working it out.

Catharsis: poetic indeed. Are there any recurring themes?

Relation to self; relationships and self. My song Good Behaviour talks about not sacrificing who I am to become something for someone else. Industry Tool is about wanting to change my relationship status on Facebook; I’m interested in the impacts of the internet on people’s personal and public relationships.

Something about the Piano is a love song inspired by Pinky Beecroft. There’s something about musical communication and connection that affects people deeply. I’m aware of that, even on stage. And then some of my songs are so private that I never perform them.

Isn’t that a little unusual? 

Yeah, I’ve got songs that I’ve written about ex-partners who have died and out of respect I have shelved some material. Plus, it upsets me to sing them publically. It’s a personal thing. I generally don’t hold back.

You say you felt isolated as a child. What was it like growing up in rural Tasmania?

I grew up in a small logging community where my mother became very involved in local environmentalism. I was picked on at school because 80% of the other kids’ parents were employed by the logging industry and this forced me to become very independent and strong-willed.

I do have environmental concerns, though they might not be obvious; I’m more likely to speak in between songs about issues that I think are important. Growing up in the forest without power, TV or many other children around made me quite self-sufficient. Because I was so isolated, I had a lot of time to think and develop my own interests.

Discovering grunge rock, I felt liberated: suddenly a whole culture of people were wearing op-shop clothes, not conforming, and I felt like I was a part of that community. I owned Hole’s albums before I’d even heard of Nirvana.

The independence of my childhood has carried through into my art as an adult in the ways that I’m DIY. I’ve taught myself how to play guitar, how to sing, how to write songs, how to manage my band, and organise gigging and touring.

 

Song writing: do you have a process?

It tends to be different every time. Sometimes I’ll start with a guitar riff and then frantically search around for lyrics to put with it. Other times, I’ll write out whole pages of lyrics and then try to set them to music. Some songs come out of jamming at band practice and I always ask the guys for input on arrangements and hooks.

The last song I wrote is Good Behaviour, which I wrote because I was angry. I felt like I was in a really tough situation and I wanted to use the song to help make me feel strong. I started with the lyrics: it’s a series of statements and affirmations. It’s stuff that I wanted to say to someone but wasn’t able to. I feel like turning that situation into a song, I managed to turn that situation around, though my boyfriend hates it when I sing that song… [Laughs]

 

On the subject of partners, Industry Tool: there can’t be many souls on Facebook who haven’t agonised over their public relationship status at some point. 

I totally agree. These days, I choose not to have a relationship status because that’s too personal. Sometimes to have the public affirmation of love is comforting, but other times it’s such a major head-fuck that I can’t be bothered with it.

 

OK, the debut album: talk us through it.

Meet The Mincers is produced by Kramer, an ex-member of Ween who produced Lou Reed and Debbie Harry. Eleven songs ranging from country-grunge elements on Look in the Mirror, to Siouxsie Sioux-esque Shorts and a Skirt, with bits of classic rock and melodic pop in between. Look in the Mirror is featured in the climactic fight scene of an upcoming Tasmanian short film, The Jelly Wrestler, by award-winning director Rebecca Thomson. Some of the songs are quite short and punchy. I’m interested to see how the album will be received on tour by an international audience.

Skipping back for a sec to where it all began: was there ever a defining moment when you were able to vanquish your tormentors at school?

Hard question. I think actually I’ve only more recently overcome it. Reconnecting with old school friends via Facebook has given us a chance to see each other objectively. There was a defining moment, though: being successful with my music, being acknowledged, gaining a Hollywood contract for songs with my first band.

When that happened I felt I really did show the world that even as a female songwriter in an isolated community, you can still be bigger than your environment and expectations of you. I felt like I proved myself. But the strongest thing that I did was to realise that I could just walk away and that I didn’t have to justify anything to anyone or take on their limited mainstream perceptions.

WHO: The Mincers
WHAT: Grunge-inspired girl rock
WHERE: Equinox, St. 278 and Bodhi Villa, Kampot
WHEN: 9pm January 25 (Equinox) and February 1 (Bodhi Villa)
WHY: Grunge lives!

 

Posted on January 24, 2013June 6, 2014Categories BooksLeave a comment on Of grunge & meat grinding
The fine art of  being fabulous

The fine art of being fabulous

Speculums, lampshades, earrings crafted out of castrated dog’s testicles: hardly your average drag queen props, but then Holestar is hardly your average drag queen. Billed by Time Out magazine as “London’s favourite tranny with a fanny” (Americans, please note: this does not mean quite what you think it means), she emerged from the world of dandyism-as-performance-art created in the 1980s by avant-garde fashion designer Leigh Bowery – he of latex dress/teetering platforms fame. Today, in day-glo wigs, vertiginous heels and impossibly long eyelashes, Holestar occupies similar cult status as a cross-dressing curio a la RuPaul and Divine. There is, however, one rather notable difference.

This former soldier with a degree in photography and masters in fine art from St Martins isn’t simply a man dressed as a woman. An altogether rarer breed, she is in fact – following the grand tradition of Julie Andrews in Victor Victoria – a (gay) woman dressed as a man dressed as a woman. Her modus operandi: “Reclaiming camp femininity from drag queens and glorifying it.”

“I never had a drag mother,” she says from a Bangkok cafe, en route to Phnom Penh. “Lots of drag queens combine forces but no one ever taught me. I just came up with the idea as an art project. It was supposed to be a one-off: me lip-synching to Shirley Bassey as a video piece. I moved to Vienna and met this DJ at a big Aids benefit, The Life Ball. A lot of my artwork at the time was to do with sexuality and gender, flamboyance and questioning those things. It was the perfect time to workshop it in front of an audience. The DJ didn’t know I was going to turn up in the worst drag ever; I had no idea what I was doing. I had a feather boa wrapped around my head; drew big lines across my forehead and put glitter on. It was just an art idea in a club and people liked it. The next thing I know I’m travelling around central Europe and making a living out of it.”

When central Europe proved too passé to contain her gender-bending persona, Holestar – real name Julie Hole (“It’s a joke but I say it because it’s true: I was Private Hole. That’s not made up. It’s my real name and it’s much better than being Private Arse.”) – gravitated towards the Big City of London where she performs everywhere “from bright stages to dingy basements” and hosts gay dating show, Take Me On. But daring to be different – to embrace the ‘other’ – isn’t without its drawbacks, even in London’s relatively liberal metropolis. Clients have cancelled gigs on discovering Holestar is genuinely female, and on New Year’s Eve she was punched in the face for intervening in a ‘queer bashing’.

“Hideous. Even in London, somewhere that’s supposed to be so open-minded. It’s New Year’s Eve, we’re all dressed up and this guy took offence to someone wearing a dress. And this is the thing: he wasn’t pretty drag; he was alternative drag, which is kind of where I’m coming from. The guy who got attacked is very avant-garde. He had these big black square eyes and a big red mouth down to his chin and he had a beard. It was quite obscure drag and this guy went ‘Eurrrghhh! What’s that?!’ and beat him up. I got a punch in the face for it as well. Absolutely disgusting.” After a complaint was lodged with the authorities, Westminster Police failed to turn up for a scheduled interview then made Julie wait 50 minutes to give a statement about the attack while they busied themselves processing someone who’d lost their keys.

“We think people are groovy and accepting of different types of people but they’re not. There’s still a lot of hatred and fear. I get people grabbing my tits and my crotch because I’m questioning their sensibilities and they can’t quite comprehend that. Don’t touch the freak! I’m here for entertainment. Something in their brain doesn’t compute what they’re looking at so they freak out. It’s rude. I’m still a human being. Come and talk to me and I’ll have a conversation with you; I’ll tell you why I do what I do. In the West, there’s a very binary sense of gender – the extreme male and female – and if you’re playing in between those roles, however temporarily, people still can’t decipher it. I like to think/hope that by the time I leave this mortal coil those boundaries will have been broken down a bit more. There needs to be more of us visible in the mainstream, which is why I believe in art and pop culture. Society is influenced a lot by pop culture.”

As an artist, Holestar deliberately sets out “to blur the boundaries between the avant-garde and mass entertainment, pop culture and the underground; indulging both those who worship at the altar of the contemporary art gallery and at the bowels of mass media”. But can such disparate forces ever be reconciled? “It took me a long time to accept that I fall in between the two. The mainstream side doesn’t get me; the avant-garde arts side doesn’t get me and I don’t really care. I know where I’m coming from and I know my intentions are good.

“There’s snobbery about what I do from certain sections and a lot of misogyny as well. It’s about accepted norms; that idea that anyone dressing up and playing gender roles is going from one to the other. It’s the fact they want a straightforward male-to-female or female-to-male. They don’t want people playing with those gender roles. Even in England, what I do is confusing for people and a little bit racy. We have so-called equality in terms of being gay or whatever but we’re still a long way off that and gender is a big taboo. People don’t want to acknowledge that there are people who play with that.”

Our conversation returns for a moment to the fusion of high and low culture, her boldest would-be act of which revolves around a tale of two testicles – those of her pet dog. The plan was to give these severed orbs a new lease of life as earrings, a plan that induced a state of near-apoplexia in animal rights’ activists. “I didn’t do it in the end but only because I moved house recently.” She lets loose a gleeful snigger. “They were in the freezer for a long time and I didn’t have the chance to put them in another freezer while I was moving. And I was getting abuse from animal rights people. It’s interesting that people think I’m doing these things to aggravate them but really it’s just the way my brain works. I’m not interested in shocking people. I don’t think it’s weird but I forget that my normal is very weird for other people. I Googled it and thought it was quite obvious. I just thought: ‘Well, no one has done it before.’”

Besides, how does that differ from fellow British artist Damien Hirst’s predilection for pickling everything from sharks to sheep? “Exactly! And this is MY dog. He’s fine; he’s not being attacked by other dogs now because he’s lost his testosterone. Otherwise, they’d just go in an incinerator. The people who attacked me for it, they just wouldn’t come round. I’ve come to the realisation that anyone who’s militant about anything, you can’t talk them out of it; whether they’re militantly religious or militant about animal rights. I don’t care. I just do what I do – and I do regret not doing it. This is my normality and it’s not freaky or weird but when I occasionally look at the world through my parents’ eyes – they’re very conventional; they read the Daily Mail, unfortunately – to people like them I’m odd but I don’t think I am at all.”

It’s Holestar’s resolute sense of self that has led her to lecture in the subject of alternative drag at several British universities, including Rose Bruford College of Theatre & Performance – something she intends to replicate here in Phnom Penh, in between scripting a new hour-long show and revelling in the success of her latest EP, Queen Of Fucking Everything. “I’ve done quite a few lecturing courses in alternative drag because there’s a history of queer studies and I was asked to do a drag queen workshop. I wasn’t really interested in the old theatrical side of things, so I did a post-Divine alternative new gender identity course and it was fabulous. It was really interesting to see people who’d never done anything at all with drag before just fall into it. There was one girl with a shaved head; a biker, really butch. By the end of it we’d put a wig on her, put some heels on her and she was fabulous!

“I felt like a mother hen with her little chicks, setting them free – ‘I’m so proud of my babies!’ It’s nice to show people there’s a new style of drag and it doesn’t really matter what’s in your underpants. It’s just about expressing yourself, so if you want to wear a lampshade on your head and have a beard and wear a pair of panties and lipstick, that’s completely fine. From what I understand about this part of the world, drag and gender are very tied up in romanticised ideas of being a pretty female lip-synching to romantic love songs, which is fine, but there are other options.”

The two-day workshop will include an introduction to the work of avant-garde pioneers Divine and Leigh Bowery – “the innovators of alternative styles of gender bending, fashion and art” – and culminate in what promises to be a deliciously flamboyant Paris Is Burning-style alternative drag pageant. “There are lots of pseudo-political things going on but ultimately it’s about having fun and being positive and empowered no matter what your gender is. I get people contacting me, especially biological women, and saying: ‘Oooh, I really want to do this.’ Well, do it! Express yourself. It’s about playing with gender roles and what people expect them to be. I don’t believe gender is binary.”

Any final words of advice? Holestar laughs her raucous, throaty laugh. “Just be fabulous, darling!”

WHO: Holestar
WHAT: A woman dressed as a man dressed as a woman
WHERE: Pontoon, St. 172
WHEN: 9pm January 24
WHY: Explore the fine art of being fabulous

Posted on January 17, 2013June 6, 2014Categories ArtLeave a comment on The fine art of being fabulous

Posts navigation

Previous page Page 1 … Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 … Page 14 Next page
Proudly powered by WordPress
Follow

Get every new post on this blog delivered to your Inbox.

Join other followers: